Hildur Kalman – författare

Under 2000-talet har det skett en markant förändring i synen på socialt arbete. Det är idag en självklarhet för socialarbetare att utgå från vetenskap och beprövad erfarenhet. Men vad är egentligen tillförlitlig och relevant kunskap inom detta fält och hur ska man förhålla sig till kunskapsbegreppet?I denna uppdaterade och omarbetade utgåva får läsaren reflektera över olika typer av kunskap: den akademiska, den som produceras i det direkta klientarbetet och den som skapas i forskningsmiljöer ute på verksamhetsfältet. Författarna diskuterar och analyserar kunskapsteorier och kunskapsbildning samt belyser frågan om hur man kan tillämpa kunskap i det dagliga arbetet. Sammantaget ger antologin perspektiv till debatten om evidens inom socialt arbete.Boken riktar sig främst till studerande vid socionomprogram, masterutbildningar och fristående kurser i socialt arbete, men även till yrkesverksamma inom socialtjänst, social omsorg och hälso- och sjukvård.Björn Blom, Stefan Morén och Lennart Nygren är professorer i socialt arbete vid institutionen för socialt arbete, Umeå universitet. Bokenskapitelförfattare är forskare, lärare och experter inom socialt arbete och angränsande ämnen.

Research collaboration in the form of networks, projects and centers has become one of the dominant modes of engaging in research, especially funded research, across all academic domains. However, there has been little research on the processes of such collaborations, particularly their affective dimensions. These, as this volume demonstrates and as researchers know well, are highly important, yet mostly not directly engaged with when scientists work together, even though they are experienced by everybody involved.

This volume is the first to consider questions such as how the naming of projects impacts on their accompanying "affect-scapes," the policing or disciplining of emotions in research collaborations, their accompanying tensions and how these might be managed, and the challenges to trust between scientists that such collaborations present. Drawing on theories of affect and literature on collaboration, as well as on the contributors’ experiences of being involved in large-scale research projects, the volume also importantly deals directly with some of the key emotions that occur during research collaborations such as blame, elation, frustration, alienation and belonging, and suggests some ways in which one might engage productively with the affective dimensions of research collaboration.

Research collaboration in the form of networks, projects and centers has become one of the dominant modes of engaging in research, especially funded research, across all academic domains. However, there has been little research on the processes of such collaborations, particularly their affective dimensions. These, as this volume demonstrates and as researchers know well, are highly important, yet mostly not directly engaged with when scientists work together, even though they are experienced by everybody involved.

This volume is the first to consider questions such as how the naming of projects impacts on their accompanying "affect-scapes," the policing or disciplining of emotions in research collaborations, their accompanying tensions and how these might be managed, and the challenges to trust between scientists that such collaborations present. Drawing on theories of affect and literature on collaboration, as well as on the contributors’ experiences of being involved in large-scale research projects, the volume also importantly deals directly with some of the key emotions that occur during research collaborations such as blame, elation, frustration, alienation and belonging, and suggests some ways in which one might engage productively with the affective dimensions of research collaboration.