Bokus

Lewis H. LaRue – författare

Visar alla böcker från författaren Lewis H. LaRue. Handla med fri frakt och snabb leverans.

4 produkter

  1. Lewis H. LaRue - Constitutional Law as Fiction, Häftad. Tillgänglighet: Lägg i varukorg

    Constitutional Law as Fiction

    Narrative in the Rhetoric of Authority

    Av Lewis H. LaRue

    Häftad, 1995

    541 kr

    Lägg i varukorg

    The fundamental thesis of Constitutional Law as Fiction is that in writing the opinion that explains a judgment, a judge not only analyzes and organizes precedent and makes and defends policy or value judgments, but he or she also tells a story, much as a historian does. Like a history, this story …

  2. David S. Caudill, Lewis H. LaRue - No Magic Wand, Inbunden. Tillgänglighet: Lägg i varukorg

    No Magic Wand

    The Idealization of Science in Law

    Av David S. Caudill, Lewis H. LaRue

    Inbunden, 2006

    1302 kr

    Lägg i varukorg

    Since 1993, Supreme Court precedent has asked judges to serve as gatekeepers to their expert witnesses, admitting only reliable scientific testimony. Lacking a strong background in science, however, some judges admit dubious scientific testimony packages by articulate practitioners, while others …

  3. David S. Caudill, Lewis H. LaRue - No Magic Wand, Häftad. Tillgänglighet: Lägg i varukorg

    No Magic Wand

    The Idealization of Science in Law

    Av David S. Caudill, Lewis H. LaRue

    Häftad, 2006

    486 kr

    Lägg i varukorg

    Since 1993, Supreme Court precedent has asked judges to serve as gatekeepers to their expert witnesses, admitting only reliable scientific testimony. Lacking a strong background in science, however, some judges admit dubious scientific testimony packages by articulate practitioners, while others …

  4. David S. Caudill, Lewis H. LaRue - No Magic Wand, E-bok. Tillgänglighet: Lägg i varukorg

    No Magic Wand

    The Idealization of Science in Law

    Av David S. Caudill, Lewis H. LaRue

    E-bok, 2006

    531 kr

    Lägg i varukorg

    Since 1993, Supreme Court precedent has asked judges to serve as gatekeepers to their expert witnesses, admitting only reliable scientific testimony. Lacking a strong background in science, however, some judges admit dubious scientific testimony packages by articulate practitioners, while others …