Scott Aikin – författare
872 kr
Skickas inom 10-15 vardagar
2 405 kr
Skickas inom 10-15 vardagar
1 386 kr
Skickas inom 10-15 vardagar
365 kr
Skickas inom 10-15 vardagar
925 kr
Läs direkt efter köp
925 kr
Läs direkt efter köp
3 650 kr
Skickas inom 10-15 vardagar
1 043 kr
Läs direkt efter köp
In the last decade, the familiar problem of the regress of reasons has returned to prominent consideration in epistemology. And with the return of the problem, evaluation of the options available for its solution is begun anew. Reason’s regress problem, roughly put, is that if one has good reasons to believe something, one must have good reason to hold those reasons are good. And for those reasons, one must have further reasons to hold they are good, and so a regress of reasons looms. In this new study, Aikin presents a full case for infinitism as a response to the problem of the regress of reasons. Infinitism is the view that one must have a non-terminating chain of reasons in order to be justified. The most defensible form of infinitism, he argues, is that of a mixed theory – that is, epistemic infinitism must be consistent with and integrate other solutions to the regress problem.
1 043 kr
Läs direkt efter köp
In the last decade, the familiar problem of the regress of reasons has returned to prominent consideration in epistemology. And with the return of the problem, evaluation of the options available for its solution is begun anew. Reason’s regress problem, roughly put, is that if one has good reasons to believe something, one must have good reason to hold those reasons are good. And for those reasons, one must have further reasons to hold they are good, and so a regress of reasons looms. In this new study, Aikin presents a full case for infinitism as a response to the problem of the regress of reasons. Infinitism is the view that one must have a non-terminating chain of reasons in order to be justified. The most defensible form of infinitism, he argues, is that of a mixed theory – that is, epistemic infinitism must be consistent with and integrate other solutions to the regress problem.
2 179 kr
Skickas inom 10-15 vardagar
581 kr
Skickas inom 10-15 vardagar
838 kr
Skickas inom 10-15 vardagar
266 kr
Skickas inom 5-8 vardagar
288 kr
Läs direkt efter köp
288 kr
Läs direkt efter köp
1 323 kr
Skickas inom 10-15 vardagar
454 kr
Läs direkt efter köp
454 kr
Läs direkt efter köp
423 kr
Skickas inom 10-15 vardagar
690 kr
Läs direkt efter köp
Why We Argue (And How We Should): A Guide to Political Disagreement in an Age of Unreason presents an accessible and engaging introduction to the theory of argument, with special emphasis on the way argument works in public political debate. The authors develop a view according to which proper argument is necessary for one’s individual cognitive health; this insight is then expanded to the collective health of one’s society. Proper argumentation, then, is seen to play a central role in a well-functioning democracy.
Written in a lively style and filled with examples drawn from the real world of contemporary politics, and questions following each chapter to encourage discussion, Why We Argue (And How We Should) reads like a guide for the participation in, and maintenance of, modern democracy. An excellent student resource for courses in critical thinking, political philosophy, and related fields, Why We Argue (And How We Should) is an important contribution to reasoned debate.
What’s New in the Second Edition:
Updated examples throughout the book, including examples from the 2016 U.S. election and first years of the Trump presidency;
Expanded coverage of dialectical fallacies, including coverage of new types of fallacies and of sites where such fallacies thrive (e.g., cable news, social media);
Revised For Further Thought questions and definitions of Key Terms, included at the end of each chapter;
The addition of five new chapters:
Deep Disagreement
Argument by Analogy
Argument between the Ads
The Owl of Minerva (or weaponizing metalanguage)
Argumentative Responsibility and Repair.
690 kr
Läs direkt efter köp
Why We Argue (And How We Should): A Guide to Political Disagreement in an Age of Unreason presents an accessible and engaging introduction to the theory of argument, with special emphasis on the way argument works in public political debate. The authors develop a view according to which proper argument is necessary for one’s individual cognitive health; this insight is then expanded to the collective health of one’s society. Proper argumentation, then, is seen to play a central role in a well-functioning democracy.
Written in a lively style and filled with examples drawn from the real world of contemporary politics, and questions following each chapter to encourage discussion, Why We Argue (And How We Should) reads like a guide for the participation in, and maintenance of, modern democracy. An excellent student resource for courses in critical thinking, political philosophy, and related fields, Why We Argue (And How We Should) is an important contribution to reasoned debate.
What’s New in the Second Edition:
Updated examples throughout the book, including examples from the 2016 U.S. election and first years of the Trump presidency;
Expanded coverage of dialectical fallacies, including coverage of new types of fallacies and of sites where such fallacies thrive (e.g., cable news, social media);
Revised For Further Thought questions and definitions of Key Terms, included at the end of each chapter;
The addition of five new chapters:
Deep Disagreement
Argument by Analogy
Argument between the Ads
The Owl of Minerva (or weaponizing metalanguage)
Argumentative Responsibility and Repair.
394 kr
Läs direkt efter köp
547 kr
Skickas inom 10-15 vardagar
1 947 kr
Skickas inom 10-15 vardagar
590 kr
Läs direkt efter köp
590 kr
Läs direkt efter köp
1 259 kr
Tillfälligt slut