"The book goes beyond its subject matter -- constitutional negotiations -- offering an imaginative, indeed philosophical, examination of how Canada has carried and should carry these out." Jenefer Curtis, Ottawa Citizen. "After all the anger and polemic of the constitutional debate, Webber's is a voice of reason -- calm, respectful of his adversaries, and tremendously insightful into the foundations of our constitutional system. This book breaks new ground, and shows how a constitution can be written for a diverse society like Canada's. He has moved the debate to a new level, by challenging the outdated concepts in which it is usually cast. This book will serve not only Canada, but will make a valuable contribution to constitution-building in the myriad of more diverse societies which are emerging on the world scene." Charles Taylor, Department of Philosophy, McGill University. "I found this an engaging, illuminating, and inspiring work, a model of incisive analysis and broad vision ... The work is notable for its sensitivity to the particular historical practices and arrangements which shape current constitutional attitudes and goals in Canada. In particular, the author's defence of asymmetry as a basic constitutional principle in Canada is the best that I have seen, and, in my opinion, is both original and persuasive ... The work is beautifully written clear, comprehensible, and suitably un-stuffy in manner and tone ... It should find an audience not only among people with a professional or academic interest in constitutional matters but also among a wider readership with an interest in public affairs." Brian Slattery, Osgoode Hall Law School, York University. "The book's strength lies in the lucid and penetrating way in which Webber helps us understand how our constitutional system in a principled manner could accommodate the cultural and linguistic diversity of the Canadian community." Peter Russell, Department of Political Science, University of Toronto.

"The book goes beyond its subject matter -- constitutional negotiations -- offering an imaginative, indeed philosophical, examination of how Canada has carried and should carry these out." Jenefer Curtis, Ottawa Citizen. "After all the anger and polemic of the constitutional debate, Webber's is a voice of reason -- calm, respectful of his adversaries, and tremendously insightful into the foundations of our constitutional system. This book breaks new ground, and shows how a constitution can be written for a diverse society like Canada's. He has moved the debate to a new level, by challenging the outdated concepts in which it is usually cast. This book will serve not only Canada, but will make a valuable contribution to constitution-building in the myriad of more diverse societies which are emerging on the world scene." Charles Taylor, Department of Philosophy, McGill University. "I found this an engaging, illuminating, and inspiring work, a model of incisive analysis and broad vision ... The work is notable for its sensitivity to the particular historical practices and arrangements which shape current constitutional attitudes and goals in Canada. In particular, the author's defence of asymmetry as a basic constitutional principle in Canada is the best that I have seen, and, in my opinion, is both original and persuasive ... The work is beautifully written clear, comprehensible, and suitably un-stuffy in manner and tone ... It should find an audience not only among people with a professional or academic interest in constitutional matters but also among a wider readership with an interest in public affairs." Brian Slattery, Osgoode Hall Law School, York University. "The book's strength lies in the lucid and penetrating way in which Webber helps us understand how our constitutional system in a principled manner could accommodate the cultural and linguistic diversity of the Canadian community." Peter Russell, Department of Political Science, University of Toronto.

"The book goes beyond its subject matter -- constitutional negotiations -- offering an imaginative, indeed philosophical, examination of how Canada has carried and should carry these out." Jenefer Curtis, Ottawa Citizen. "After all the anger and polemic of the constitutional debate, Webber's is a voice of reason -- calm, respectful of his adversaries, and tremendously insightful into the foundations of our constitutional system. This book breaks new ground, and shows how a constitution can be written for a diverse society like Canada's. He has moved the debate to a new level, by challenging the outdated concepts in which it is usually cast. This book will serve not only Canada, but will make a valuable contribution to constitution-building in the myriad of more diverse societies which are emerging on the world scene." Charles Taylor, Department of Philosophy, McGill University. "I found this an engaging, illuminating, and inspiring work, a model of incisive analysis and broad vision ... The work is notable for its sensitivity to the particular historical practices and arrangements which shape current constitutional attitudes and goals in Canada. In particular, the author's defence of asymmetry as a basic constitutional principle in Canada is the best that I have seen, and, in my opinion, is both original and persuasive ... The work is beautifully written clear, comprehensible, and suitably un-stuffy in manner and tone ... It should find an audience not only among people with a professional or academic interest in constitutional matters but also among a wider readership with an interest in public affairs." Brian Slattery, Osgoode Hall Law School, York University. "The book's strength lies in the lucid and penetrating way in which Webber helps us understand how our constitutional system in a principled manner could accommodate the cultural and linguistic diversity of the Canadian community." Peter Russell, Department of Political Science, University of Toronto.