Monica K. Miller is a Foundation Professor with appointments in the Criminal Justice Department and the Interdisciplinary Social Psychology Ph.D. Program at the University of Nevada, Reno, USA. She co-edits the American Psychology-Law Society book series (APA Books) and the Advances in Psychology and Law series (Springer). Logan A. Yelderman is Associate Professor in Psychology in the Marvin D. and June Samuel Brailsford College of Arts and Sciences at Prairie View A&M University, USA. He was recently awarded an NSF grant for his work in legal decision-making and currently serves on the editorial board of the Psychology, Crime & Law journal. Matthew T. Huss is a Professor in the Department of Psychological Science at Creighton University, USA. He is a graduate of the Clinical Psychology Training Program and the Law and Psychology Program at the University of Nebraska-Lincoln, USA. He is the author of numerous publications, including a textbook on forensic psychology. Jason A. Cantone is a Senior Researcher at the Federal Judicial Center and an Adjunct Professor in the Department of Criminology, Law, and Society at George Mason University, USA. His research focuses on judicial and court decision-making, access to justice, civil procedure, and discrimination in legal and employment contexts. This work was completed outside of his position at the Federal Judicial Center.

• Part I. Introductions: 1. A modern approach to the psychology of legal decision making; 2. 'I Hope the final judgment's fair': alternative jurisprudences, legal decision-making, and justice; 3. Diversity and bias in legal decision making: broadening frameworks and addressing overlooked issues; 4: Judicial decision-making; Part II. Pre-trial phase decision-making: 5. Victim decision-making; 6. Bystanders' crime reporting decisions; 7. Pre-Trial publicity's effects on jurors' and judges' decision; 8. Police decisions involved in collecting eyewitness identification evidence; 9. Decisions related to miranda rights; 10. Judges' daubert decisions; 11. The psychology of confession decision making during police Interrogation; 12. Plea bargaining: understanding the decision-making processes of plea negotiation; 13. Forensic science decision-making: expertise lends both skills and vulnerabilities; 14. Decision-making by forensic mental health evaluators; 15. Interviewing suspects in criminal investigations: decisions and their consequences; 16: Prosecutorial decision-making in cases of child sexual abuse: lessons from Australia; 17. Decision-Making about restoration of defendants who are incompetent to stand trial; 18. Clinical decision-making regarding criminal responsibility; 19. Decision-Making regarding child victims and witnesses; Part III. Trial phase decision-making: 20. Social cognition of jury decision-making; 21. Beliefs about juror decision-making and the jury process; 22. Deciphering directives: juror decision-making challenges with understanding judicial instructions; 23. Decisions surrounding the use of expert testimony; 24. Legal and extra-legal factors that affect jurors' decisions; 25. Decisions regarding insanity; 26. Decision making in the shadow of evidence law; 27. Decision-making in contested divorce child custody cases; Part IV. Post-conviction phase decisions: 28. Amenability to treatment evaluations: understanding decision points and new information regarding assessment; 29. Choosing between life and death: capital jury penalty phase decision-making; 30. The communication of risk to legal decision-makers; 31. Psychology of parole decision-making; 32. Probation decision-making; 33. Decision-making in violence risk assessment; Part V. Other legal decision-making: 34. Decision making in immigration court; 35. Evaluation decisions by psychologists about causation and damages in personal injury and employment discrimination cases: a pragmatic five-stage model for courts; 36. Factors influencing the decision to commit white collar crime: integrating affluenza with established risks; 37. Tort law decision-making: psychological and legal perspectives; 38. Judicial decision-making in juvenile dependency and juvenile justice cases; 39. Legislative decision making; 40. Decision-Making in alternative dispute resolution; 41. Criminal decision-making; 42. Social worker decision-making: a framework for legally literate accountable practice; 43. Decision-Making in civil matters: the role of substituted judgment; Part VI. Perspectives from the field: 44. Culturally competent perspectives and a legally literate practice promote quality decisions in social work; 45. Making probation decisions in the real world; 46. Justice for all: reflections as a clinician at the intersections; 47. Police officer decisions in interrogations and investigations; 48. Restoration: the sequel to incompetency to stand trial; 49. To tell or not to tell; is that the question?: victim decision-making; 50. Diversity in legal decision-making; Conclusion: 51. Conclusions from the field of legal decision-making.

Monica K. Miller is a Foundation Professor with appointments in the Criminal Justice Department and the Interdisciplinary Social Psychology Ph.D. Program at the University of Nevada, Reno, USA. She co-edits the American Psychology-Law Society book series (APA Books) and the Advances in Psychology and Law series (Springer). Logan A. Yelderman is Associate Professor in Psychology in the Marvin D. and June Samuel Brailsford College of Arts and Sciences at Prairie View A&M University, USA. He was recently awarded an NSF grant for his work in legal decision-making and currently serves on the editorial board of the Psychology, Crime & Law journal. Matthew T. Huss is a Professor in the Department of Psychological Science at Creighton University, USA. He is a graduate of the Clinical Psychology Training Program and the Law and Psychology Program at the University of Nebraska-Lincoln, USA. He is the author of numerous publications, including a textbook on forensic psychology. Jason A. Cantone is a Senior Researcher at the Federal Judicial Center and an Adjunct Professor in the Department of Criminology, Law, and Society at George Mason University, USA. His research focuses on judicial and court decision-making, access to justice, civil procedure, and discrimination in legal and employment contexts. This work was completed outside of his position at the Federal Judicial Center.

• Part I. Introductions: 1. A modern approach to the psychology of legal decision making; 2. 'I Hope the final judgment's fair': alternative jurisprudences, legal decision-making, and justice; 3. Diversity and bias in legal decision making: broadening frameworks and addressing overlooked issues; 4: Judicial decision-making; Part II. Pre-trial phase decision-making: 5. Victim decision-making; 6. Bystanders' crime reporting decisions; 7. Pre-Trial publicity's effects on jurors' and judges' decision; 8. Police decisions involved in collecting eyewitness identification evidence; 9. Decisions related to miranda rights; 10. Judges' daubert decisions; 11. The psychology of confession decision making during police Interrogation; 12. Plea bargaining: understanding the decision-making processes of plea negotiation; 13. Forensic science decision-making: expertise lends both skills and vulnerabilities; 14. Decision-making by forensic mental health evaluators; 15. Interviewing suspects in criminal investigations: decisions and their consequences; 16: Prosecutorial decision-making in cases of child sexual abuse: lessons from Australia; 17. Decision-Making about restoration of defendants who are incompetent to stand trial; 18. Clinical decision-making regarding criminal responsibility; 19. Decision-Making regarding child victims and witnesses; Part III. Trial phase decision-making: 20. Social cognition of jury decision-making; 21. Beliefs about juror decision-making and the jury process; 22. Deciphering directives: juror decision-making challenges with understanding judicial instructions; 23. Decisions surrounding the use of expert testimony; 24. Legal and extra-legal factors that affect jurors' decisions; 25. Decisions regarding insanity; 26. Decision making in the shadow of evidence law; 27. Decision-making in contested divorce child custody cases; Part IV. Post-conviction phase decisions: 28. Amenability to treatment evaluations: understanding decision points and new information regarding assessment; 29. Choosing between life and death: capital jury penalty phase decision-making; 30. The communication of risk to legal decision-makers; 31. Psychology of parole decision-making; 32. Probation decision-making; 33. Decision-making in violence risk assessment; Part V. Other legal decision-making: 34. Decision making in immigration court; 35. Evaluation decisions by psychologists about causation and damages in personal injury and employment discrimination cases: a pragmatic five-stage model for courts; 36. Factors influencing the decision to commit white collar crime: integrating affluenza with established risks; 37. Tort law decision-making: psychological and legal perspectives; 38. Judicial decision-making in juvenile dependency and juvenile justice cases; 39. Legislative decision making; 40. Decision-Making in alternative dispute resolution; 41. Criminal decision-making; 42. Social worker decision-making: a framework for legally literate accountable practice; 43. Decision-Making in civil matters: the role of substituted judgment; Part VI. Perspectives from the field: 44. Culturally competent perspectives and a legally literate practice promote quality decisions in social work; 45. Making probation decisions in the real world; 46. Justice for all: reflections as a clinician at the intersections; 47. Police officer decisions in interrogations and investigations; 48. Restoration: the sequel to incompetency to stand trial; 49. To tell or not to tell; is that the question?: victim decision-making; 50. Diversity in legal decision-making; Conclusion: 51. Conclusions from the field of legal decision-making.

Monica K. Miller is a Foundation Professor with appointments in the Criminal Justice Department and the Interdisciplinary Social Psychology Ph.D. Program at the University of Nevada, Reno, USA. She co-edits the American Psychology-Law Society book series (APA Books) and the Advances in Psychology and Law series (Springer). Logan A. Yelderman is Associate Professor in Psychology in the Marvin D. and June Samuel Brailsford College of Arts and Sciences at Prairie View A&M University, USA. He was recently awarded an NSF grant for his work in legal decision-making and currently serves on the editorial board of the Psychology, Crime & Law journal. Matthew T. Huss is a Professor in the Department of Psychological Science at Creighton University, USA. He is a graduate of the Clinical Psychology Training Program and the Law and Psychology Program at the University of Nebraska-Lincoln, USA. He is the author of numerous publications, including a textbook on forensic psychology. Jason A. Cantone is a Senior Researcher at the Federal Judicial Center and an Adjunct Professor in the Department of Criminology, Law, and Society at George Mason University, USA. His research focuses on judicial and court decision-making, access to justice, civil procedure, and discrimination in legal and employment contexts. This work was completed outside of his position at the Federal Judicial Center.

• Part I. Introductions: 1. A modern approach to the psychology of legal decision making; 2. 'I Hope the final judgment's fair': alternative jurisprudences, legal decision-making, and justice; 3. Diversity and bias in legal decision making: broadening frameworks and addressing overlooked issues; 4: Judicial decision-making; Part II. Pre-trial phase decision-making: 5. Victim decision-making; 6. Bystanders' crime reporting decisions; 7. Pre-Trial publicity's effects on jurors' and judges' decision; 8. Police decisions involved in collecting eyewitness identification evidence; 9. Decisions related to miranda rights; 10. Judges' daubert decisions; 11. The psychology of confession decision making during police Interrogation; 12. Plea bargaining: understanding the decision-making processes of plea negotiation; 13. Forensic science decision-making: expertise lends both skills and vulnerabilities; 14. Decision-making by forensic mental health evaluators; 15. Interviewing suspects in criminal investigations: decisions and their consequences; 16: Prosecutorial decision-making in cases of child sexual abuse: lessons from Australia; 17. Decision-Making about restoration of defendants who are incompetent to stand trial; 18. Clinical decision-making regarding criminal responsibility; 19. Decision-Making regarding child victims and witnesses; Part III. Trial phase decision-making: 20. Social cognition of jury decision-making; 21. Beliefs about juror decision-making and the jury process; 22. Deciphering directives: juror decision-making challenges with understanding judicial instructions; 23. Decisions surrounding the use of expert testimony; 24. Legal and extra-legal factors that affect jurors' decisions; 25. Decisions regarding insanity; 26. Decision making in the shadow of evidence law; 27. Decision-making in contested divorce child custody cases; Part IV. Post-conviction phase decisions: 28. Amenability to treatment evaluations: understanding decision points and new information regarding assessment; 29. Choosing between life and death: capital jury penalty phase decision-making; 30. The communication of risk to legal decision-makers; 31. Psychology of parole decision-making; 32. Probation decision-making; 33. Decision-making in violence risk assessment; Part V. Other legal decision-making: 34. Decision making in immigration court; 35. Evaluation decisions by psychologists about causation and damages in personal injury and employment discrimination cases: a pragmatic five-stage model for courts; 36. Factors influencing the decision to commit white collar crime: integrating affluenza with established risks; 37. Tort law decision-making: psychological and legal perspectives; 38. Judicial decision-making in juvenile dependency and juvenile justice cases; 39. Legislative decision making; 40. Decision-Making in alternative dispute resolution; 41. Criminal decision-making; 42. Social worker decision-making: a framework for legally literate accountable practice; 43. Decision-Making in civil matters: the role of substituted judgment; Part VI. Perspectives from the field: 44. Culturally competent perspectives and a legally literate practice promote quality decisions in social work; 45. Making probation decisions in the real world; 46. Justice for all: reflections as a clinician at the intersections; 47. Police officer decisions in interrogations and investigations; 48. Restoration: the sequel to incompetency to stand trial; 49. To tell or not to tell; is that the question?: victim decision-making; 50. Diversity in legal decision-making; Conclusion: 51. Conclusions from the field of legal decision-making.